Quote:
Originally Posted by aggie99
Quote:
Originally Posted by OH-JJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grizbear98
I don't understand how destroying the environment to get a natural resource that is diminishing, can be replaced by newer technologies, and the cost will not be reflected for 7 years and will STILL be high, helps us at all
|
perhaps you can elaborate your straw man argument alittle. |
Watch the insults, it is the fastest way to kill a good debate and end this thread. |
Because there isn't a decent alternative out there for transportation purposes that could be implemented in a shorter timeline. There is a huge infrastructure component that can't be eliminated anytime soon. Heck, E85 is an alternative for many flexfuel vehicles, but how many gas stations around you sells it?