View Single Post
Old 07-14-2008, 05:07 PM   #45 (permalink)
SlvrDragon50
Grouper

Forum Stats
 
Join Date: 07/04/2008
Posts: 556

Profile Info
 
Location:
United States
Age: 17
Dives Logged: 0-24
Send a message via AIM to SlvrDragon50
California is pretty good with the newer gas alternatives. They have several hydrogen filling stations among with some hundred or so cars. Once theybgo through testing it shouldn't be long before it starts spreading.

Quote:
Originally Posted by georoc01 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aggie99 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by OH-JJ View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grizbear98 View Post
I don't understand how destroying the environment to get a natural resource that is diminishing, can be replaced by newer technologies, and the cost will not be reflected for 7 years and will STILL be high, helps us at all

perhaps you can elaborate your straw man argument alittle.
Watch the insults, it is the fastest way to kill a good debate and end this thread.
Because there isn't a decent alternative out there for transportation purposes that could be implemented in a shorter timeline. There is a huge infrastructure component that can't be eliminated anytime soon. Heck, E85 is an alternative for many flexfuel vehicles, but how many gas stations around you sells it?
SlvrDragon50 is offline   Reply With Quote