![]() |
Or Search ScubaToys.com for Gear! |
|
|||||||
| Aeris - Oceanic - Hollis From the Pelagic Family of Products |
|
Welcome to the Scuba Forum - Scuba Diving Forums and Discussion Board. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Grouper
|
Aeris Computers and Reverse Profiles.
I did 2 dives last sunday and the behaviour of my Aeris Atmos Pro was interesting. I have seen it do this before but this was much more extreme.
(Dives were planned on V-Planner and the computer was along for the ride on the second dive) First dive was to around 100 feet,came up to 80 or so after a while then lots of time above 30 feet. At depth it was nudging the orange,surfaced with one blob into the green. Nothing too crazy. Surface Interval 1:47 Second dive was a trimix dive (21/25) to 170,planned for 15 minutes bottom time. Average depth was actually around 150. I just left the computer set on air. Anyway,by the time we got back up to 30 feet the computer was asking for 105 minutes of deco,wheras a more realistic figure (from V-planner) would be something like 20 minutes So the computer was being HUGELY conservative,which is odd as the aeris algorithm is normally very liberal. I fully understand that the Atmos Pro is not intended to be used for this type of diving but I would be interested to know where this conservatism comes from. I suspect it is something that Aeris adds in to discourage reverse profiles (especially if they involve deco) rather than something that is in the base algorithm ?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Guppy
|
I don't know what conservatism is built into it, but it can't be much because I really though the pelagic computers have the most liberal algorithm out there. But then again it really isn't designed for tech diving like that and really don't know how it would react to being exposed to conditions like that. Could just be that you overshoot all of the presets and it just kind of "ran home to mommy" and gave you a bunch of deco obligation to be safe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Guppy
Founding Member
|
Quote:
Interresting experiment!
__________________
Dive safe and often! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| aeris xr1 | chewyjr15 | Computers and Gauges | 39 | 06-30-2008 12:16 PM |
| Top of the line computers? | JugglingMonkeys | Computers and Gauges | 68 | 10-14-2007 03:32 PM |
| Aeris Nomad Bag... | norine62 | Bags and Diving Luggage | 3 | 08-24-2007 11:13 PM |
| Aeris XT BCD, anybody use one? | scubaguy4409 | BC's - Buoyancy Compensators - Stab Jackets | 0 | 08-20-2007 10:40 PM |
| How conservative are computers? | Advokat | Computers and Gauges | 5 | 08-07-2007 03:03 PM |