Scuba Forum - Scuba Diving Forums and Discussion Board   Visit our ScubaToys.com Site!
Or Search ScubaToys.com for Gear!
 
Use the Search in the Navbar to search the forum.

Forum Photo Gallery Get Your Scuba Gear Here Scuba Classes & Diver Training Store Cam Scuba Videos
Go Back   Scuba Forum - Scuba Diving Forums and Discussion Board > Scuba and Dive Gear Forum > Mask / Snorkels / Fins
Register FAQLive Chat Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Mask / Snorkels / Fins Personal Gear questions and opinions.

Welcome to the Scuba Forum - Scuba Diving Forums and Discussion Board.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Split Fins versus non split, what are the pros and cons?

Reply
 
LinkBack (2) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-02-2007, 12:44 PM   #1 (permalink)
mkenyon2
TadPole

Forum Stats
 
Join Date: 07/30/2007
Posts: 5

Profile Info
 
Location:
United States
Dives Logged: 0-24
Split Fins versus non split, what are the pros and cons?

What do you folks feel about the 2 types?
mkenyon2 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2007, 12:48 PM   #2 (permalink)
ccarter
Grouper
 
ccarter's Avatar

Forum Stats
 
Join Date: 09/18/2007
Posts: 256

Profile Info
 
Location:
USA
Age: 24
Dives Logged: 51-100
My Photos: 3 Images
Never used split but I always heard you have an easier time kicking since you're not putting out as much power..? Not sure if that's true or not..

I've found I like ScubaPro Jets the best.. but I haven't really tried that many different fins..
__________________
ccarter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2007, 01:38 PM   #3 (permalink)
Venio
Grouper
Founding Member
 
Venio's Avatar

Forum Stats
 
Join Date: 07/11/2007
Posts: 301

Profile Info
 
Location:
Arlington, TX
Dives Logged: 0-24
My Photos: 28 Images
Both split and non split fins have their benefits. So first you should ask yourself what type of diving you are interested in and that will determine the type of fins you need.

If you are going to dive purely recreational and have no intention of doing Tech, Cave or Wreck you want the splits. They are easy to do fluter kick with and reduce the fatigue on your legs. They will also give you a lot of speed. My first fins were Apollo Bio Fins which I really love but they are not good for what I want to do now, which leads to the second option of your diving interest.

Tech, Wreck or Cave diving utilize different type of finning like frog, helicopter, backwards and their modifications. Those finning techniques are if not impossible then very hard to be performed with splits. Here a good old solid fin comes in action. I'm now using Scubapro Jet fins which has been around for the last 40 year. They are all one needs if tech diving is your goal.

Regards.
__________________
Tempt me not!
I can do it myself!

Venio is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2007, 01:48 PM   #4 (permalink)
CompuDude
Grand Master Spammer
Founding Member
 
CompuDude's Avatar

Forum Stats
 
Join Date: 07/11/2007
Posts: 7,680

Profile Info
 
Location:
Studio City, CA, USA
Dives Logged: 101-500
Venio pretty much nailed it, but I'll add this:

Splits are good if you have knee or ankle problems. They're great for moving fast in a straight line.

HOWEVER: If you have needs for precision positioning, such as photography, however, those alternate finning techniques used by tech divers will come in handy while you try to maintain position to take your shot.

Additionally, there are other kicks that are more efficient and use less energy (and thus, air) than the flutter kick you use with splits.

I have both splits (apollo bio-fins) and Jet fins, and I like both. I think the Jet fins are more versatile, however. They're also better for pushing a drysuit and doubles through the water, whereas splits are happier with a simpler wetsuit and singles setup.

Oh, and either way... consider spring straps.
CompuDude is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2007, 01:58 PM   #5 (permalink)
ChrisA
Grouper

Forum Stats
 
Join Date: 07/31/2007
Posts: 421

Profile Info
 
Location:
Redondo Beach, California
Dives Logged: 101-500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkenyon2 View Post
What do you folks feel about the 2 types?
It is very much like gears on a bicycle. I've used both some split fins and the heavy "blade" types like Turtles and Jets.

With a the split fins you will go cruise with less effort but you have less power available. Split fins have a range where they are very effisent in terms of effort used over speed. but if you move out of this range to say tow a driver or swimm into a very strong current the spit fins just don't work. They just bend and provide little power. But at the low-effort end of the range they are very good at converting a low-effort fluter kick into forward speed. Another say to say this is that you can't put a large amount of force into split fins if you do it is like driving on ice, the wheels just spin. Nothing wrong with any of this.

I dive twice a week with "turtles" and tried some tusa split fins that I bought (from ST) for my 14 year old son who was complaining about sore legs. I put these on and it felt like I had forgotten my fins, no resistance in the water. But then I look down and yes I was moving over the sand bottom. They solved my son's problem.

The big stiff blades give better control for things I do like photography and lobster hunting or for a tech diver who needs to push a drysuit, doubles and a few stage bottles through the water. I can swim backwards and do frog kicks and they do offer a lot of power the few times I've had to tow a diver.

But I have to admit the real reason I moved from Mares Quato to Turtles was that I needed a larger fin to fit over my DUI rock boots. Those boots are huge and I do need them to climb over rocks at the beach.
ChrisA is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2007, 02:19 PM   #6 (permalink)
ccarter
Grouper
 
ccarter's Avatar

Forum Stats
 
Join Date: 09/18/2007
Posts: 256

Profile Info
 
Location:
USA
Age: 24
Dives Logged: 51-100
My Photos: 3 Images
Quote:
Originally Posted by CompuDude View Post
HOWEVER: If you have needs for precision positioning, such as photography, however, those alternate finning techniques used by tech divers will come in handy while you try to maintain position to take your shot.
Not that I'm a serious/good photographer or anything.. I just use a Point & Shoot.. but I dove a week in Bonaire using Jets and loved it.. I didn't notice it at the time since I had been using Jets on a few other dives as well.. but I recently lost one and had to go back to some old school aqua lung fins (very long.. flappy fins). They definitely lack the precision and power that jets have. It was very easy to use a variety of kicks and stay hovering which made taking photos easier.

I don't do any tech stuff at all but I'm really impressed with the Jets.. just haven't got around to re-purchasing after I lost one. Plan to before my trip to the Caymans.
__________________
ccarter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2007, 02:28 PM   #7 (permalink)
Clanggedin
Grouper
 
Clanggedin's Avatar

Forum Stats
 
Join Date: 09/25/2007
Posts: 397

Profile Info
 
Location:
Salem, Utah
Dives Logged: 25-50
According to the lastest 2007 ScubaLab Fin review, the Atomic "Smoke on the Water" fins produce 41 lbs of thrust. I can't find any info on how much thrust the ScubaPro Jets produce, so I can't say if they are significantly better than the new Atomics in thrust, but comparing it to the blades that they tested it, had just as much or more thrust than those tested.

Don't discount splits as being a weaker fin, I'm sure they can push a dry suit quite well.
Clanggedin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2007, 02:43 PM   #8 (permalink)
CompuDude
Grand Master Spammer
Founding Member
 
CompuDude's Avatar

Forum Stats
 
Join Date: 07/11/2007
Posts: 7,680

Profile Info
 
Location:
Studio City, CA, USA
Dives Logged: 101-500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clanggedin View Post
According to the lastest 2007 ScubaLab Fin review, the Atomic "Smoke on the Water" fins produce 41 lbs of thrust. I can't find any info on how much thrust the ScubaPro Jets produce, so I can't say if they are significantly better than the new Atomics in thrust, but comparing it to the blades that they tested it, had just as much or more thrust than those tested.

Don't discount splits as being a weaker fin, I'm sure they can push a dry suit quite well.
What ScubaLabs doesn't test is a fully loaded diver pushing into a current.

Splits do indeed produce an incredible amount of thrust, but the way they test is is they put someone into an ideal situation with a minimum of gear. Add a drysuit and doubles to the mix, and you have to push harder than the splits like, and then they start to lose power compared to the paddle fins.

Look at it like this: Splits have a "power band". Stay within that band, and in a straight line, you'll do VERY well with splits (as long as you only want to make speed in a straight line). Move beyond that band, and there's no way to get more power out of the splits by applying more power from your legs... there's not room in the kick, you can only kick so fast in a small flutter, and kicking too big results in LESS power being delivered.
CompuDude is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2007, 06:50 PM   #9 (permalink)
floater
Guppy
 
floater's Avatar

Forum Stats
 
Join Date: 09/11/2007
Posts: 125

Profile Info
 
Location:
United States
Dives Logged: 101-500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clanggedin View Post
According to the lastest 2007 ScubaLab Fin review, the Atomic "Smoke on the Water" fins produce 41 lbs of thrust. I can't find any info on how much thrust the ScubaPro Jets produce, so I can't say if they are significantly better than the new Atomics in thrust, but comparing it to the blades that they tested it, had just as much or more thrust than those tested.
That's the wrong metric to use.

What you want to know, or what I at least want to know, is how efficient is the fin as measured by diver's air consumption when finning to cover distance at normal rates but conserving air and using (a) flutter or scissor kick, and (b) frogkick or modified frogkick, which ever is most efficient. In addition you'll want to know how the fin performs in currents, how they work for the back kick and other alternative kicks, how comfortable the foot pockets are and so forth.

Even then it would be difficult to get proper results since testers will likely perform better on the types of fins they are used to and normally wear for fun.

Last edited by floater : 10-02-2007 at 06:55 PM.
floater is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2007, 07:05 PM   #10 (permalink)
somewhereinla
Grouper
Founding Member

Forum Stats
 
Join Date: 07/11/2007
Posts: 278

Profile Info
 
Location:
United States
Dives Logged: No Info Given
I use the Apollo bio fins and frog kicks or doing photography with them has not been a problem, I have also been caught in very strong current and found them to be good as well. Do remember that all split fins are created equal and you usually get what you pay for... The only major disadvantage with split fins is torque which means that getting to speed take longer and they are not as responsive, but once you get them going they are really great. You will also require much less energy and strenght, which mean you air consumption will be better. I do agree that split fins are not adequate for technical diving.
somewhereinla is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Go Back   Scuba Forum - Scuba Diving Forums and Discussion Board > Scuba and Dive Gear Forum > Mask / Snorkels / Fins

Reply


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://forum.scubatoys.com/mask-snorkels-fins/4520-split-fins-versus-non-split-what-pros-cons.html
Posted By For Type Date
Untitled document This thread Refback 03-26-2008 05:20 PM
Scubapro XL Jets vs IDI/XS Scuba XL Power Fins - Page 3 - ScubaBoard This thread Refback 11-04-2007 09:59 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Split vs Blades fins: What is your preference? deepdiver47 Mask / Snorkels / Fins 81 09-26-2007 10:55 AM
Split Fins (comments) & Ankle Issue porsche060 Mask / Snorkels / Fins 10 09-25-2007 09:43 PM
oceanic v16 split fins. coralcrazed Mask / Snorkels / Fins 8 09-21-2007 12:45 AM
Like new Atomic Aquatics Split fins ttosh Used Stuff for Sale 7 09-05-2007 06:09 PM
Tusa Full Foot Split Zoom Fins Capt Hook Mask / Snorkels / Fins 4 08-25-2007 01:39 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin 3.6.72009 Copyright 2000-2007 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Copyright ©2000-2008, ScubaToys Enterprises LLC
Site Maintained and Secured by Clan Solutions®, LLC.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172