![]() |
Or Search ScubaToys.com for Gear! |
|
|||||||
| Mask / Snorkels / Fins Personal Gear questions and opinions. |
|
Welcome to the Scuba Forum - Scuba Diving Forums and Discussion Board. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
TadPole
|
Apollo Bio-Fin Pro vs. Bio-Fin XT vs. ScubaPro TwinJets
I'd like to hear from anyone that has much experience in diving with Apollo Bio Fins and ScubaPro Twinjets. How do they compare? What differences did you notice?
Here on Saipan, most people in the split fin crowd are using the Twin Jets. I had a chance to dive both the Bio-Fins and the TwinJets and didn't really notice much of a difference except it seemed to me the Bio-Fin had a better fitting foot pocket. That may have been my imagination, I didn't get to use either for long. Also, what's the difference between the Bio Fin XT and the Bio Fin Pro? I was planning on getting the XTs for my wife and I but she wants smalls and the XT doesn't seem to come in a small so I suppose I need to get her the Pros. Question is then, do I need to spend the extra $10 on the XTs for myself? Is there any noticable difference in them? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Grouper
|
Check out the latest edition of Scuba Diving Magazine. It has test results for 15 different fins. The Apollo Bio Pro Split fins did extremely well. The Scubapro split fins did realitively poorly (especially compared to the Apollo's). The main difference is design and materials used. The Apollo fins seem to provide the user with much more power than the Scubapro. I have to admit, I'm a bit disappointed (I have a pair of the Scubapro's)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Grand Poobah
Founding Member
ST-Forum Mod |
Correct... We used to sell both in the shop, and people comparing them in our pool ended up with the Apollo every time.
As far as the XT - they are a slightly stiffer rubber compound, that while it gives a feeling that you're doing more - they are actually slightly slower and less efficient. But some people just don't like the feel that they are not wearing fins when they kick the standard bios - so they do the stiffer ones. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
TadPole
|
I own the Bio's and my dad has got the twin jet black (stiffer and negative bouyant). One day we swapped fins just to see if their is a real big difference. Sure is. The Bio's don't have the "jets" like the Twin Jets do. So for the Twin Jets, I look at that as a loss of power right their. another is the backbone on the Bio's and Twin Jets. The Bio's are a little bit more stiffer than the Twin Jet black. Again, loss of power. Now don't get wrong the Twin Jets are good fins, especially in a flutter but overall they just don't generate the performance that the Bio's has to offer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
TadPole
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Apollo Bio Filter | terrillja | Apollo | 28 | 10-30-2008 09:14 PM |
| Apollo Bio Fin fit question | Souvy | Mask / Snorkels / Fins | 24 | 03-06-2008 09:53 PM |
| Apollo Bio fins | deepdiver47 | WTB | 2 | 09-03-2007 11:27 PM |
| Black Tusa X-pert Zooms vs. Apollo Bio Fin XT | Souvy | Mask / Snorkels / Fins | 9 | 08-26-2007 09:00 PM |
| Mares Raptor Fin vs Apollo Bio Fin Pro | Cichlid | Mask / Snorkels / Fins | 1 | 08-16-2007 07:01 PM |