Table Rock Lake

[cummings66]

Originally Posted by Rascal1933

<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Hey there Matthew, </DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Let's go get jacewindu,and show him Tablerock!</DIV>

<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Hey Rascal, have I dove with you? I've dove with several Robs but I can't place your handle here?</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>If you're close someday we need to dive.</DIV>

[tc_rain]

Too bad, that would have been better then sunken boats and stuff they usually put in quarries

[cummings66]

They place stuff like that at the lakes as well, but some things are real. Personally I enjoy the rocks and walls.

[texdiveguy]

This u/w water bridge ( old-Kimberling City bridge) should be an interesting venture in October...and the recovery of some items and collection of historical data,,,brrrrr!

[cummings66]

Geographic Names Information System Feature Detail Report


Feature ID: 751405
Name: Oasis (historical)
Class: Populated Place
Description: Inundated by Table Rock Lake
Citation: Collected during Phase I data compilation (1976-1981), primarily from U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale topographic maps (or 1:25K, Puerto Rico 1:20K), various edition dates, and from U.S. Board on Geographic Names files.
Entry Date: 24-Oct-1980
Elevation(ft/m): 915/279


Counties


Sequence County Code State Code Country
1 Taney 213 Missouri 29 US



Coordinates (One point per USGS topographic map containing the feature, NAD83)


Sequence Latitude(DEC) Longitude(DEC) Latitude(DMS) Longitude(DMS) Map Name
1 36.5386752 -93.2996271 363219N 0931759W Table Rock Dam



Designations


Designation Description
Historical This feature no longer exists

[cummings66]

http://digital.library.umsystem.edu/...A-TANEY-12.TIF

http://digital.library.umsystem.edu/...start=1;resnum=

http://www.scubaboard.com/gallery/sh...0/ppuser/44417

http://geonames.usgs.gov/pls/gnis538...amp;fid=751405

The above are links to platmaps of the area before TableRock lake was around. Also some of my gallery pictures I come up with. Click on Satellite for the geonames entry to see a real picture of the area it's at.

[cummings66]

The bridge is supposed to be deep if you want to dive down to the road,I think I was told the top is around 100 feet deep with the bottom being around 140 feet, I think. It's a dive that demands better than average skills and air consumption.

[texdiveguy]

Originally Posted by cummings66

The bridge is supposed to be deep if you want to dive down to the road,I think I was told the top is around 100 feet deep with the bottom being around 140 feet, I think. It's a dive that demands better than average skills and air consumption.

Yes you are right....it is one of those spots that is deep and dark.....we will be diving trimix and low vis protocols.

[cummings66]

If you've got the time afterwards, dive the spot I posted above for Oasis. That is an accurate location for it and you can trust the data. I will warn you that Nemo from scubaboard did a sidescan sonar image of the area and didn't see the church like the DT mag said existed off of main street.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>However I'm not 100% sure he used the right coordinates because of something he said.</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>

[fire diver]

Originally Posted by cummings66

If you've got the time afterwards, dive the spot I posted above for Oasis. That is an accurate location for it and you can trust the data. I will warn you that Nemo from scubaboard did a sidescan sonar image of the area and didn't see the church like the DT mag said existed off of main street.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>However I'm not 100% sure he used the right coordinates because of something he said.</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>

<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>I'd bet cash money that nothing but foundations are left of the town. Whenever the COE did these projects, they demolished everything. I don't know why. It makes no sense to me. A 15, 20, even 30-ish high building, covered by 100 or more feet of water poses no risk to anyone.</DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>FD</DIV>