Scuba Forum - Scuba Diving Forums and Discussion Board   Visit our ScubaToys.com Site!
Or Search ScubaToys.com for Gear!
 
Use the Search in the Navbar to search the forum.

Forum Photo Gallery Get Your Scuba Gear Here Scuba Classes & Diver Training Store Cam Scuba Videos
Go Back   Scuba Forum - Scuba Diving Forums and Discussion Board > Dive Spots > US Diving > Midwest
Register FAQLive Chat Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Midwest Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin

Welcome to the Scuba Forum - Scuba Diving Forums and Discussion Board.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

U.S. Coast Guard to Patrol Table Rock?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-10-2008, 06:50 PM   #1 (permalink)
snagel
Barracuda
 
snagel's Avatar

Forum Stats
 
Join Date: 08/04/2007
Posts: 1,280

Profile Info
 
Location:
Warrensburg, MO USA
Age: 42
Dives Logged: 101-500
U.S. Coast Guard to Patrol Table Rock?

When I was down at Scuba Sports in Branson, they were telling me that all the instructors were taking classes so that they could take a boat of students/divers out on a boat. The said this was going to be a new requirement because the U.S. Coast Guard was going to start patrolling the lake.

Apparently, they will not have any jurisdiction over the private boats, but will over the "commercial" vessals such as dive boats and charters.

I wonder if they will have any effect on the ski-doo's flying around the dive flags? Or, any jurisdiction over dive flags for that matter.

I'm thinking, this might also have something to do with Homeland Security due to the dam.

Anybody know anything about this?

S. Nagel
snagel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 07:51 PM   #2 (permalink)
billucusdiver
Guppy
 
billucusdiver's Avatar

Forum Stats
 
Join Date: 09/19/2007
Posts: 67

Profile Info
 
Location:
Springfield MO
Dives Logged: 101-500
The reason they are taking classes is most likley not because the coast gaurd is going to patrol table rock. It is more likley they are getting there six pack license so they can take people out for hire. As per coast guard regulations they cannot recive any payment for opperating commercialy unless they have at least a six pack license.
billucusdiver is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 08:07 PM   #3 (permalink)
cummings66
Grand Master Spammer
Founding Member
 
cummings66's Avatar

Forum Stats
 
Join Date: 07/10/2007
Posts: 4,610

Profile Info
 
Location:
Moberly, MO
Age: 43
Dives Logged: No Info Given
Scuba Sports had some of their instructors to where they could do this, but my best guess is that not all of them did. In the past Monty was about the only one who could take you out in the boat and the others didn't. I think Louis could too but rarely did.

However, they have a few others and I'm guessing it's about time they got them certified. I know there were times I wanted a trip that I couldn't get it because somebody was gone and those two were the only ones who could do it.

You never know with the government though, could be lots of reasons.
__________________
Matthew P. Cummings
Moberly MO
cummings66 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 08:21 PM   #4 (permalink)
Navy OnStar
Grouper
 
Navy OnStar's Avatar

Forum Stats
 
Join Date: 11/05/2007
Posts: 628

Profile Info
 
Location:
Pensacola, Florida United States
Age: 38
Dives Logged: 51-100
If the Coast Guard is patrolling, then I would think they would have the same jurisdiction over private/commercial boats/jet skis/etc. That they do anywhere else.
Navy OnStar is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 09:05 PM   #5 (permalink)
snagel
Barracuda
 
snagel's Avatar

Forum Stats
 
Join Date: 08/04/2007
Posts: 1,280

Profile Info
 
Location:
Warrensburg, MO USA
Age: 42
Dives Logged: 101-500
Yes, I do remember the phrase "six pack". I was hoping it didn't have something to do with Budweiser. I was talking to Andy and he said Monte had it and so did Louis. He was currently finishing it up.

Andy told me that the Water Patrol still had jurisdiction over the private vessals - boats, jet skies, etc. But, specifically said that the Coast Guard only had jurisdiction over the the "commercial" guys and not the private.

Just going off what I was told.

S. Nagel
snagel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 09:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
Navy OnStar
Grouper
 
Navy OnStar's Avatar

Forum Stats
 
Join Date: 11/05/2007
Posts: 628

Profile Info
 
Location:
Pensacola, Florida United States
Age: 38
Dives Logged: 51-100
Quote:
Originally Posted by snagel View Post
Yes, I do remember the phrase "six pack". I was hoping it didn't have something to do with Budweiser. I was talking to Andy and he said Monte had it and so did Louis. He was currently finishing it up.

Andy told me that the Water Patrol still had jurisdiction over the private vessals - boats, jet skies, etc. But, specifically said that the Coast Guard only had jurisdiction over the the "commercial" guys and not the private.

Just going off what I was told.

S. Nagel
The Coast Guard would still have jurisdiction if they wanted but they probably have an agreement with the Water Patrol to just stick with the commercial boats. I'm sure if they saw something blatantly dangerous on a private boat that they would probably step in.
Navy OnStar is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 09:51 PM   #7 (permalink)
snagel
Barracuda
 
snagel's Avatar

Forum Stats
 
Join Date: 08/04/2007
Posts: 1,280

Profile Info
 
Location:
Warrensburg, MO USA
Age: 42
Dives Logged: 101-500
I agree
snagel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Go Back   Scuba Forum - Scuba Diving Forums and Discussion Board > Dive Spots > US Diving > Midwest

Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Coast Guard Search Criteria - increase your chances of being found! Navy OnStar Tragedies, Accidents, Unfortunate Events, etc 49 02-02-2008 01:00 PM
rash guard coralcrazed Accessories 9 10-29-2007 11:43 AM
Table rock lake dive sites Kidder Midwest 14 09-05-2007 10:21 PM
Table Rock Lake Report skdvr Midwest 5 08-23-2007 05:46 PM
Table Rock Lake cummings66 Midwest 33 08-15-2007 05:44 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin 3.6.72009 Copyright 2000-2007 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Copyright ©2000-2008, ScubaToys Enterprises LLC
Site Maintained and Secured by Clan Solutions®, LLC.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172